![]() ![]() Picker, Comparative Legal Traditions, Thomson/West, Boston, 1982. Solum, Constitutionalism Originalism: A Debate, Cornel University Press, 2011.īrown, Gordon, The Universal Declaration of Human Rights in the 21st Century: A Living Document in Changing World, A Report by a Global Citizenship Commission, 2006.Ĭalabresi, Steven, The History and Growth of Judicial Review, Volume 2, OUP, Oxford, 2021. Mirza Satria Buana, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lambung Mangkuratīennett, Robert W dan Lawrence B. It concludes that the dichotomy can only be used in a teaching and pedagogical setting of human rights, but the dichotomy cannot sustain the test in theoretical-conceptual and practical analyses. This paper analyses the dichotomy from the standpoint of the right to development, with some pivotal approaches, including conceptual, case law, and comparative constitutional law approaches. ![]() The dichotomy has been embedded due to the historical description of generations of human rights, encompassing the civil and political rights that have liberalism influences, to the economic, social, and cultural rights that have socialist influences, and the last generation of rights being the collective and solidarity rights. This paper examines the conceptual dichotomy between ‘negative right’ and ‘positive right’ in the current discourse of human rights. ‘negative right’ ‘positive right’ human rights right to development comparative constitutional law Abstract Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lambung Mangkurat ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |